Compliance & Certification
Compliance & Certification Readiness
A program-ready approach to compliance: we define responsibilities, lock interfaces, and deliver a validation evidence package (test plan, pass/fail summary, issue log, release artifacts) aligned to your target markets and lab execution.
- Compliance scope definition (program-defined, market-specific)
- Responsibility matrix: controller vs BMS vs pack fault ownership and limits
- Versioned documentation: CAN/UART mapping + wiring/pinout + release notes
- Validation evidence package: test plan, pass/fail summary, issue log, closure tracking
- Production handoff artifacts: QA gates and traceability fields (program-defined)
We provide certification readiness deliverables (documentation, interface definitions, and validation evidence). Certification execution and pass outcomes depend on the program plan and the selected third-party lab partner.
What this solution is (and is not)
This solution helps your team prepare for certification by producing structured evidence and release artifacts. We do not “guarantee certification.” Certification outcomes depend on program scope, test conditions, design decisions, and lab execution.
Compliance readiness deliverables
Deliverables are designed to make integration and lab execution controllable.
- Compliance scope checklist: target market, applicable standards, and program gates (program-defined)
- Responsibility matrix: who owns which limits, faults, and derating behaviors across controller/BMS/pack
- Interface documentation: CAN/UART message map, scaling rules, timing, wiring/pinout, connector notes
- Validation evidence package: test plan + pass/fail summary + issue log + closure tracking
- Release artifacts: version identifiers, change log, release notes, and traceability fields (program-defined)
How we support EVT → DVT → PVT
- Scope definition: identify compliance targets and program constraints
- Baseline & interfaces: lock responsibility matrix and versioned interfaces
- EVT evidence: first test plan execution + findings log
- DVT evidence: robustness, thermal margin, fault behavior, and closure discipline
- PVT handoff: release package, QA gates, traceability fields, and manufacturing readiness notes
Evidence package structure (what OEM teams can review)
- Test plan: test objectives, conditions, acceptance criteria, and instrumentation
- Pass/Fail summary: results by test item, with version references
- Issue log: severity, root-cause hypothesis, action owner, closure evidence
- Release notes: what changed, why, and what needs re-validation
- Traceability fields: identifiers and mapping rules (program-defined)
What changes by application (Mobility vs Energy Storage)
| Dimension | Mobility (E-bike / LEV) | Energy Storage (UPS / ESS / BBU) |
| Primary concerns | ride stability + thermal margin + field service | safety containment + operational reliability + monitoring |
| Evidence emphasis | transient behavior, derating feel, service logs | deterministic safety behavior, incident traceability, monitoring signals |
| Integration boundary | controller↔BMS↔motor/powertrain | BMS↔pack↔system controller/monitoring stack |
| Lab execution | program-defined, market-specific | program-defined, market-specific |
Inputs we need to scope compliance readiness
To provide an accurate readiness plan, we typically request:
- Target market(s) and intended compliance scope (program-defined)
- Program phase and timeline (EVT/DVT/PVT)
- Duty cycle profile and environment constraints
- Interfaces: controller/BMS/pack responsibilities, CAN/UART expectations
- Manufacturing constraints and service expectations (if applicable)
Request a compliance readiness proposal
Share your target markets, program profile, and duty cycle definition. We’ll respond with a structured readiness plan and next-step questions.
We deliver integration-ready documentation and validation evidence; certification execution depends on program plan and lab partner.